Chock and Bates: 2026 Olympics Figure Skating Scoring Does ‘Disservice’

A significant point of contention surrounding the 2026 Winter Games involved the judging results in the figure skating ice dance competition, where the French duo Laurence Fournier Beaudry and Guillaume Cizeron triumphed over the highly anticipated American favorites, Madison Chock and Evan Bates.

This outcome was not well-received within the United States, and Chock and Bates addressed the ongoing dispute during their discussion with USA Today on Thursday. Although they refrained from echoing the stronger sentiments of some of their supporters, they conceded that this incident has cast a shadow on the sport of figure skating’s public image:

“Whenever the audience finds the outcomes perplexing, it negatively impacts our discipline,” Chock stated on Thursday.

“Cultivating spectator loyalty becomes challenging when the events unfolding on the ice are hard to interpret. I believe a greater degree of transparency is essential for athletes, mentors, and viewers alike, to foster a robust following for the future. Individuals must grasp the specifics of what they are applauding and maintain trust in the athletic endeavor they champion.”

The core of the problem lies with a judging framework where most officials scored higher for the American competitors, yet the French pair ultimately secured the victory.

An examination of the separate judges’ marks for the free dance reveals that the French official’s scores are notable, providing their countrymen with their second-highest mark and assigning Chock and Bates their lowest, creating a discrepancy of almost eight points. In contrast, the judge from the United States awarded Chock and Bates approximately four points more favorably.