Barely two weeks have passed since the contenders for the 2026 men’s NCAA basketball competition were finalized, and already the field has narrowed to the Elite Eight stage.
College basketball correspondents Jeff Borzello and Myron Medcalf from ESPN offer their forecasts for the forthcoming Saturday encounters between Illinois and Iowa, and Arizona and Purdue. Furthermore, they analyze the pivotal factors for each squad to progress to the Final Four.
6:09 p.m. ET, TBS/truTV
Borzello’s projected outcome: Illinois, 72-66
Medcalf’s projected outcome: Illinois, 77-70
Illinois’ path to the Final Four: Should Illinois maintain its current defensive prowess, it is expected to overcome Iowa and stand a strong chance of securing a national title. The Illini limited both VCU and Houston to 55 points individually in their last two outings, and have now restricted five out of their last ten adversaries to less than one point per possession. Kylan Boswell’s aggressive play at the guard position, coupled with the team’s height and reach on the perimeter, and their ability to defend the basket, equips them sufficiently to at least try to disrupt Bennett Stirtz’s performance. Stirtz managed only 12 points from 17 attempts in the initial encounter between these two Big Ten squads.
From an offensive standpoint, Illinois is likely to dominate offensive rebounding — the Illini are among the top five nationally in points scored from second opportunities per contest. Iowa furthermore finished last in the conference in opponent free throw attempt frequency. An additional crucial element might be Illinois’ effectiveness in drawing fouls and converting free throws.
0:49
No. 9 Iowa vs. No. 3 Illinois game preview
Check out some stats on Illinois’ Elite 8 matchup with Iowa in the NCAA men’s tournament.
Iowa’s route to the Final Four: Iowa’s predominant advantage throughout the NCAA tournament has been its knack for dictating the pace of play. The Hawkeyes’ initial match against Clemson registered 54 possessions, marking the slowest contest for either participant throughout the entire season. Their subsequent victory over Florida involved the lowest number of possessions the Gators had experienced all season. Furthermore, their Sweet 16 triumph over Nebraska constituted the slowest-paced game the Cornhuskers had played all year. Can Iowa replicate this against Illinois? The first encounter between these two Big Ten adversaries more closely aligned with the Illini’s favored speed, though the Hawkeyes’ early deficit and their struggle with rallies played a more significant role.
Two additional critical elements for Iowa include: Stirtz must prevail in the point guard duel against Boswell and Keaton Wagler, and the Hawkeyes must prevent Illinois — the Big Ten’s premier offensive rebounding squad — from seizing control of put-back situations. — Borzello
8:49 p.m. ET, TBS/truTV
Borzello’s projected outcome: Arizona, 81-74
Medcalf’s projected outcome: Arizona, 85-82
Arizona’s path to the Final Four: While Purdue demonstrates a greater commitment to defensive play compared to Arkansas, Arizona will nevertheless find a favorable encounter against the Boilermakers on that side of the court. Purdue yielded almost 1.27 points per possession to Texas in the Sweet 16, and the Boilermakers have allowed a minimum of 1.05 points per possession in 10 of their last 11 contests. They ranked a mere 14th in the Big Ten for 2-point shot defense. Consequently, Arizona simply needs to adhere to its established style and consistently aim to penetrate the restricted area.
Either Brayden Burries or Jaden Bradley ought to be capable of driving into the key reliably, and Motiejus Krivas, Tobe Awaka, and Koa Peat should find opportunities in the low post. Arizona does not attempt many shots from beyond the arc, yet it is notable that Purdue possessed one of the poorest 3-point defenses in the Big Ten, potentially affording the Wildcats some additional unguarded attempts.
On the defensive end, the crucial aspect is for Bradley and Burries to prevent Braden Smith from freely orchestrating plays in the half-court offense. Both possess sufficient physicality to challenge him effectively.
0:51
No. 2 Purdue vs. No. 1 Arizona game preview
Check out some stats on the matchup between Purdue and Arizona in the men’s NCAA tournament.
Purdue’s route to the Final Four: Their strategic emphasis must be on preventing Arizona from thoroughly controlling the interior game at both ends of the floor. The Wildcats exhibit superiority in offensive rebounding, scoring near the basket, and frequently earning trips to the charity stripe. Purdue, boasting the second-highest defensive rebounding percentage in the Big Ten, will need to assert itself on the boards while avoiding accumulating fouls. Daniel Jacobsen’s difficulties late in the season have intensified the need for Oscar Cluff to remain on the court. Should he be sidelined for extended periods, this would pose a significant disadvantage for the Boilermakers.
On offense, Fletcher Loyer will be the pivotal player. Purdue must achieve significant success from beyond the arc to match Arizona’s proficiency inside the 2-point line, and Loyer has converted four three-pointers in each of the Boilermakers’ three NCAA tournament contests. — Borzello
