A former leader of the Springboks has voiced concerns regarding South Africa’s playmakers following their 38-22 loss to Australia at Ellis Park, questioning the capability of Manie Libbok to orchestrate a Test match when circumstances shifted against him.
Since the defeat, Libbok’s showing has been a focal point for critique, with his intercepted pass to Joseph Suaalii and defensive errors identified as pivotal moments.
During the Talking Boks broadcast, Mallett suggested that the Springboks’ deficiency in direction from the scrumhalf and flyhalf positions significantly contributed to the setback.
With no alternative No.10 available on the bench, Libbok was required to participate for the entire 80 minutes.
“From that point onwards, our halfbacks [Grant Williams and Libbok] did not effectively manage the game,” Mallett lamented. “The nine and 10 need to be in control, recognizing the game’s evolving nature.”
“Sometimes, with Manie, as seen with the Stormers, when things are progressing positively, he thrives with quick ball. His choices are generally sound. However, when the ball speed decreases, he often persists in attempting to maintain that rapid tempo, emphasizing a wide-passing approach, striving for pace.”
“In my opinion, this marked the beginning of our adoption of an unsuitable rugby style against Australia. They excel in transitions and possess highly skilled players. We committed numerous errors in that second half.”
“This match demanded enhanced game management – strategic kicks into the corners, incorporation of the driving maul, and keeping Australia uncertain. Instead, we catered to their strengths.”
However, opinions on X have varied considerably.
Certain observers contended that it was unjust to single out the DHL Stormers flyhalf, highlighting instead the Boks’ struggling set-piece and defensive vulnerabilities. Rugby analyst Paul Williams emphasized that Libbok could not bear exclusive responsibility for the loss, stating: “It’s unfair to blame Manie Libbok for the defeat, though some will, inexplicably,” while one Springbok supporter reminded fellow fans that “he wasn’t responsible for the seven lost lineouts.”
