Will Sinner-Alcaraz make majors boring?

Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner have exclusively claimed the last eight major tournament championships.

These two competitors have faced each other in the last three championship matches, providing exciting spectacles—particularly at the French Open last June, where Alcaraz secured a remarkable victory after fending off three championship points.

However, during this period, their competitors ranked within the top ten have largely failed to pose a significant challenge.

“A scenario where only two individuals dominate is not beneficial,” remarked Pat Cash, the victor of Wimbledon in 1987, speaking on the BBC 5 Live program previewing the Australian Open.

“There exist those two individuals, and then there are the rest.”

Concerns arise that, despite the thrill their championship encounters provide, the men’s bracket might grow overly foreseeable should their supremacy persist.

In the ongoing tournament in Melbourne, Alcaraz has secured his initial three victories without losing a set. Sinner, meanwhile, conceded only ten games across his first two rounds, though he confessed to being “fortunate” regarding the timing of a heat-mandated pause in his third-round contest, which enabled him to alleviate cramps en route to defeating Eliot Spizzirri over four sets.

“While unpredictability remains a factor in an extended competition, a scenario featuring only two dominant figures is not inherently beneficial for major tennis championships or the professional circuit,” Cash further elaborated.

“When the conversation revolves around just two athletes, that constitutes an issue.”