When Jannik Sinner exited the Roland Garros tournament on Thursday, succumbing more to Europe’s unusual high temperatures than to Juan Manuel Cerundolo, it signaled that the French Open’s outcome would hinge on more than just superior athletic performance.
The upcoming ten days or so in Paris will predominantly be a test of mental fortitude.
Without Sinner absent and Carlos Alcaraz sidelined due to injury, the tournament’s conclusion will present one of two scenarios:
-
It is possible that the 39-year-old Novak Djokovic, now a sporadic participant on the ATP Tour and facing physical challenges in lengthy five-set encounters, will secure his 25th Grand Slam title, thereby undeniably demonstrating the historical feebleness of the men’s tennis field beyond its top echelon.
-
Alternatively, a player without a previous major championship will seize this rare, potentially once-in-a-lifetime, chance.
The question then becomes, who will emerge victorious?
Alexander Zverev, considered by many the most accomplished male player never to have claimed a Grand Slam, has consistently faltered under pressure when nearing a major victory. The current weight of expectation on him will be unprecedented.
Casper Ruud, often seen as the epitome of sportsmanship in tennis and a finalist twice at the French Open, could finally have his moment. Yet, can one truly rely on a competitor who has consistently lacked the ruthless edge needed to dominate such a critical juncture?
Are any of the highly promising 19-year-olds, such as Joao Fonseca or Rafael Jodar, genuinely prepared for a challenge of this magnitude?
Following over two decades during which a select few athletes largely controlled major tournaments, an intriguing scenario is now developing at Roland Garros.
However, this situation also carries the risk of rendering the current generation of hopefuls a subject of future derision.
Should the 39-year-old Djokovic secure his fourth title at this event, it would deservedly be hailed as a colossal accomplishment. Regardless of Djokovic’s already formidable legacy, claiming a major championship so near his fortieth birthday would significantly bolster his argument for being the sport’s unparalleled master.
Novak Djokovic uses ice cubes to cool down during his men’s singles match against Valentin Royer on day 4 of the French Open.
(NurPhoto via Getty Images)
Conversely, what message would it convey about the collective character of the young players in their twenties, excluding Alcaraz and Sinner, if they allowed an aging, physically compromised veteran, who rarely competes on the tour, to snatch away their prime opportunity to win a major title?
Such an outcome would be nearly unpardonable. It would serve as a damning critique of a mentally vulnerable cohort of tennis professionals unable to perform under pressure. A profound discredit.
While holding the utmost regard for Djokovic — and he is certainly deserving of immense admiration — this particular scenario ought not to materialize.
Indeed, his continued participation and fervent desire, especially after achieving Olympic gold in 2024 and fulfilling every tennis ambition, confirm his status as an extraordinary athlete.
Maintaining the rigorous discipline required for training, preserving peak physical condition, and continuously seeking to refine and adapt one’s play without a clear external objective is inherently difficult. A body showing signs of age only amplifies this struggle — and Djokovic frequently appears on court lately as if on the brink of physical collapse.
His continued engagement in the sport can only be attributed to one compelling factor: beyond Sinner and Alcaraz, he perceives a vulnerability among his competitors. This perception is well-founded.
Consider the 2020 U.S. Open, the most recent occasion a men’s major had such an unpredictable field. Recall that Roger Federer was injured, while Rafael Nadal chose not to travel due to COVID-19 worries and his focus on the postponed French Open in autumn. Djokovic participated but was disqualified after angrily striking a ball that hit a linesperson’s throat.
Unexpectedly, an unheralded champion was poised to claim a major title. The resulting tennis, to put it mildly, mirrored the immense pressure felt by nearly every participant. The championship match itself — where Dominic Thiem triumphed over Zverev in a fifth-set tiebreaker, despite Zverev initially holding a two-set lead — showcased some of the most anxious, tension-ridden, and hesitant play ever witnessed in such a high-stakes environment.
The spectacle was far from elegant.
Yet, it served as a significant learning experience — possibly most acutely for Djokovic. Despite acknowledging at the 2025 U.S. Open that enduring five-set matches against both Alcaraz and Sinner in a single event seemed improbable, he understood that a solitary injury or an off day for others could present him with such an opening.
We now face a Roland Garros where every competitor still in contention believes they have a path to victory. For many, this conviction might prove to be more detrimental than advantageous.
Should these aspiring young players lack the fortitude to rise to the occasion or overcome their psychological barriers in the crucial stages of major tournaments, Djokovic will gladly capitalize on their shortcomings.
Remarkably, Djokovic frequently appears unremarkable in his recent performances — until he’s under intense scrutiny. Following his unexpected Australian Open final, Djokovic competed in two events, recording two wins and two losses, including defeats to Jack Draper and Dino Prižmić.
Even during his second-round contest on Wednesday, Djokovic required almost four demanding hours to overcome the 74th-ranked Valentin Royer.
For the other players, however, defeating him at a major tournament in recent years represents an immense mental hurdle akin to the physical one — and who possesses arguably the finest mental game in tennis history? Even at 39, that particular strength remains undiminished.
Should this competition become a test of who possesses the courage to seize the most significant chance of their professional lives, historical patterns suggest his opponents will falter, leaving Djokovic to depart with yet another major award.
Should individuals like Zverev and Ruud permit this outcome during their peak physical years, they would merit ridicule — and perpetual major-less status — throughout their remaining careers.
