Ennis declared, “I exhausted every effort to bring this bout to fruition for the supporters. My patience was tested, and I remained silent throughout the process. It appears Vergil or his camp genuinely wished to avoid the match.”
The current IBF welterweight titleholder additionally recalled a time in November when he journeyed to Ortiz’s home city and was present at one of his contests. Ennis mentioned having a direct conversation with him then, unequivocally stating his desire for him to be his subsequent opponent.
“I attended his fight in his own city and informed him he was my forthcoming challenger,” Ennis penned.
Approximately sixty minutes subsequent, Ortiz responded, refuting the insinuation that his camp dodged the confrontation. The undefeated fighter from Texas stated that the discussions were hindered by legal intricacies, rendering the circumstances considerably more complex than Ennis had presented.
“Given that no one possesses the acumen to discern the subtext and recognize our genuine attempts to secure this fight despite the persistent legal quandaries, I shall clarify it for you and everyone else,” Ortiz communicated online.
Ortiz refrained from elaborating on the specific legal difficulties within his communication. The circumstances seem connected to the type of promotional and broadcasting disagreements that have made numerous significant matches more intricate in recent memory.
This exchange highlights the persistent discord between both teams. Enthusiasts have advocated strongly for the Ennis–Ortiz encounter, viewing it as one of the most compelling matchups in the welterweight division, yet currently, the dialogue unfolds virtually instead of inside the boxing ring.
